Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-04 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-05-04 Senate Journal Page 3153 SB 160 Senator Bunde requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 160(FIN)(efd fld) "An Act relating to a procurement and electronic commerce tools program for state departments and instrumentalities of the state" be taken up. The bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 1, line 10: Delete "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the" Insert "The" Page 1, line 11: Delete "AS 36.30.100 - 36.30.190" Insert "this chapter" 2006-05-04 Senate Journal Page 3154 Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 160(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Huggins, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 160(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 160(FIN) am "An Act relating to a procurement and electronic commerce tools program for state departments and instrumentalities of the state; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 160(FIN) am Third Reading - On Reconsideration YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Huggins, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 160(FIN) am passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Gary Stevens moved for the adoption of the effective date clauses. 2006-05-04 Senate Journal Page 3155 The question being: "Shall the effective date clauses be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 160(FIN) am Effective Date Clauses YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Huggins, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson and so, the effective date clauses failed and CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 160(FIN) am(efd fld) "An Act relating to a procurement and electronic commerce tools program for state departments and instrumentalities of the state" was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.